"the fighter jet" is wondering about this apparent misnomer. While my initials may have at one time been falsely linked with an American destruction machine, your initials are the same as this jetport... what's up with that?
The traditional allocation of executive responsibilities and viewing of pictures of legs has always been so determined as to liberate the view-ee incumbent from the administrative minutiae by devolving the managerial functions to those whose experience and qualifications have better formed them for the performance of such humble feet and legs, thereby releasing their pictoral pictures for the more onerous duties and profound deliberations which are the inevitable concomitant of their exalted position. Furthermore, while it's clear that the committee has agreed that your 'new leg' is a really an excellent leg but in view of some of the doubts being expressed, may I propose that I recall that after careful consideration, the considered view of the committee was that while they considered that 'the leg' met with broad approval in principle, that some of the principles were sufficiently fundamental in principle and some of the considerations so complex and finely balanced in practice, that, in principle, it was proposed that the sensible and prudent practice would be to submit 'the leg' for more detailed consideration, laying stress on the essential continuity of the 'new leg' with existing principles, and the principle of the principle arguments which 'the leg' proposes and propounds for their approval, in principle. And in conclusion, the fact that you needed to know was not known at the time that the now known need to know was known, therefore those that needed to advise and inform 'the Kerux' perhaps felt the information he needed as to whether to inform the highest authority (in this case Kerux) of the known information was not yet known and therefore there was no authority for the authority to be informed because the need to know was not, at that time, known or needed.
I think that about sums it up..I await your reply.
Thanks brother, I appreciate your reply and deep consideration given to the statement :-) but I didnt ask a question. Did you ice your foot? Can you post an update picture on the continued progress...like every hour perhaps? :-) You could do like a dualing foot healing thing...well perhaps not. Look forward to seeing you soon brother.
It wasn't me. I didn't dub jlf81 a fighter jet, that was my old buddy Truth Explorer (aka TE- God rest his blog). But I think he was onto something: JLF81 does kinda sound like a jet-fighter, with all that whining about his poison ivy! It hurts my ears just to read it.
Also, since I'm not related to him, I'm not going to call him a "jet-mouth" like you did way back when. Furthermore, I noticed he's commenting only as "JLF" now, he must be trying to camouflage himself.
"Here" and "There" are strange words. I'm always "Here", wherever I go. Is there a particular reason you're glad I'm here, or is it just the general sense of contentment that seems to radiate from me?
Wowzza, what were you doing there brother! :-) how far did you walk to get that hole in your foot!? Thanks for joining in...now that will give brother Paul a run for his money! Now we have a swollen foot, a ivy infected foot, a unknown injury and a hole in a foot. hmmm, which one will win...
"the fighter jet" is wondering about this apparent misnomer. While my initials may have at one time been falsely linked with an American destruction machine, your initials are the same as this jetport... what's up with that?
ReplyDeleteThere's your new nickname... "Jetport."
hmmm...is this a conspiracy..two ankle/leg posts in one day?? perhaps I shall post a pic of my leg too, to join in the group :-)
ReplyDeleteDavid
A. I am the one that told you about the Jetport - so that does not count.
ReplyDeleteB. You were JLF81 and it was the astonishing Derifter (whatever THAT means!) that named you a fighter jet. So your fight is with him.
C. There is no C.
I'd rather be a fighter jet than a jet port anyway.
ReplyDeleteWho wouldn't.
Duh.
Oh, and btw, Dave, you and Ken would both have to post pictures of your legs for it to count.
ReplyDeleteOr I suppose since they're identical legs you could just post two pictures of your leg and say that one is yours and one is Ken's...
Weird.
Julian and/or Kerux,
ReplyDeleteThe traditional allocation of executive responsibilities and viewing of pictures of legs has always been so determined as to liberate the view-ee incumbent from the administrative minutiae by devolving the managerial functions to those whose experience and qualifications have better formed them for the performance of such humble feet and legs, thereby releasing their pictoral pictures for the more onerous duties and profound deliberations which are the inevitable concomitant of their exalted position. Furthermore,
while it's clear that the committee has agreed that your 'new leg' is a really an excellent leg but in view of some of the doubts being expressed, may I propose that I recall that after careful consideration, the considered view of the committee was that while they considered that 'the leg' met with broad approval in principle, that some of the principles were sufficiently fundamental in principle and some of the considerations so complex and finely balanced in practice, that, in principle, it was proposed that the sensible and prudent practice would be to submit 'the leg' for more detailed consideration, laying stress on the essential continuity of the 'new leg' with existing principles, and the principle of the principle arguments which 'the leg' proposes and propounds for their approval, in principle. And in conclusion,
the fact that you needed to know was not known at the time that the now known need to know was known, therefore those that needed to advise and inform 'the Kerux' perhaps felt the information he needed as to whether to inform the highest authority (in this case Kerux) of the known information was not yet known and therefore there was no authority for the authority to be informed because the need to know was not, at that time, known or needed.
I think that about sums it up..I await your reply.
David
Dave -
ReplyDeleteIn answer to your question: No.
Thanks brother, I appreciate your reply and deep consideration given to the statement :-) but I didnt ask a question. Did you ice your foot? Can you post an update picture on the continued progress...like every hour perhaps? :-) You could do like a dualing foot healing thing...well perhaps not. Look forward to seeing you soon brother.
ReplyDeleteDavid
It wasn't me. I didn't dub jlf81 a fighter jet, that was my old buddy Truth Explorer (aka TE- God rest his blog). But I think he was onto something: JLF81 does kinda sound like a jet-fighter, with all that whining about his poison ivy! It hurts my ears just to read it.
ReplyDeleteAlso, since I'm not related to him, I'm not going to call him a "jet-mouth" like you did way back when. Furthermore, I noticed he's commenting only as "JLF" now, he must be trying to camouflage himself.
I'm glad you are finally here, Derifter.
ReplyDelete"Here" and "There" are strange words. I'm always "Here", wherever I go. Is there a particular reason you're glad I'm here, or is it just the general sense of contentment that seems to radiate from me?
ReplyDelete"Here" as in "my blog."
ReplyDeleteI need somebody to fend off the whiner with me... and I knew I could count on you!
I feel somehow left out. I bought some new flip-flops and gouged a lovely hole in my foot: http://img174.imageshack.us/img174/8695/img16417ew.jpg
ReplyDeleteChris,
ReplyDeleteWowzza, what were you doing there brother! :-) how far did you walk to get that hole in your foot!? Thanks for joining in...now that will give brother Paul a run for his money! Now we have a swollen foot, a ivy infected foot, a unknown injury and a hole in a foot. hmmm, which one will win...
David