Maybe I think about things too much, but here are a couple of ideas to consider as you plan an online worship service or something similar.
One of the best pieces of advice I read suggests pastors should stay in their lanes. If you are suddenly videoing yourself, don’t act like you’ve got the full production studio working behind you. Just… be normal. Few things are worse to watch than somebody acting like they are pro when they are quite clearly not. You were not hired to be a reporter or newsreader or game show host. Be you.
Another free piece of advice, this one just from me, is this: Don’t make it too good. Read some Neil Postman before you shoot. Think about the effect of the medium itself. We committed to a no-rehearsal, no-edit version of a stripped down Sunday worship service for the first two weeks of the pandemic. This was intentional. I would argue that as production quality increases, authenticity diminishes. In fact, we shot the whole thing on one iPhone with zero edits. And, in my opinion, it was fine. Listen, I used to work a little in this field. The bad lighting, bad sound and one-shot filming did everything wrong in one sense, but everything as close to right in another. We were not filming this service to send out to the world. It was for our members. They know us, so they know fake.
All of us understand this intuitively. Does anyone really believe reality television is real? What does your heart do when someone points a camera at you? I doubt you act all normal… or real. (If you want authentic reality television, sit at your window and watch people walk by. Or simply watch people in a crowded room when they think nobody is looking at them.)
I get it. There is a sense in which I am different when I stand in front of my church family and lead a service. I am projecting my voice, so speaking differently. I am choosing suitable words for the occasion, so my vocabulary is more considered. I am standing in front of a whole bunch of people looking at me, so my self-awareness is different. That is what it is. I am simply suggesting that if you are going to do something online, be that guy. The guy you normally are on Sundays.
One last thought for you. We taped all of our services on the Saturday before they were broadcast. This may sound like the opposite of what I was saying above and that we were somehow less authentic because we were not live. But I would argue the opposite was true. Once you do anything live, there is a whole other level of stressors to deal with that tend to distract from the one thing you need most in order to not be fake. That thing? You have to actually be worshiping God in your heart. You can do that on a Saturday and have it be just as real when it is posted on a Sunday.
For what it is worth, we have decided (for other reasons) to move away from providing a weekly worship service. This has nothing to do with production or being real and everything to do with our understanding of what a church is. But, in order to serve our folks, we will record a weekly chapel service and we will hold to the principles above. May God give us all much wisdom.
Thanks for your reflections... helpful
ReplyDeleteThanks
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeletePaul, I'm being redirected to your blog from Tim Challies' article:
ReplyDeletehttps://www.challies.com/articles/why-our-church-is-only-sort-of-streaming-our-services/
In it he writes that as a result of the social quarantine "The elders met and determined we would go online with a basic but still genuine worship service."
This happened only twice. March 15th & March 22nd. Two online "stripped down church services".
You opened up your March 15th worship service by saying that it will include "confession" and "assurance of pardon", two elements of a genuine worship service.
https://www.gfcto.com/mediaPlayer/#/sermonvideo/672
If the reason for switching from a weekly worship service to a weekly chapel service has everything to do with your understanding of what a church is, as you say above, then it implies that this understanding was incomplete on both March 15th & March 22nd.
A false start ensued. Because "the elders met and determined..."
Challies writes: "This distinction [church vs. chapel] may be a fine one, but it was helpful in directing us. It resolved the question of the Lord’s Supper—we are not assembling as a local church so it would be inappropriate to attempt to celebrate the Lord’s Supper."
However, Paul, way back in 2006 you had meticulously outlined in your sermon the 6 characteristics of an "authentic church".
1. Devotion to Doctrine
2. Devotion to Lord's Supper
3. Devotion to Prayer
4. Devotion to Fellowship
5. Devotion to Personal Spirituality
6. Devotion to Evangelism
https://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=1806163729
From your own definition of what an authentic church is it would have sufficed to immediately conclude that NO authentic church service could be offered online. Not for members of a church whose very name includes "Fellowship. Why does then Challies write that the "different nomenclature" was helpful in that it "resolved the question of the Lord's Supper..."? You had long ago determined that Lord's Supper was an essential characteristic of an authentic church.
Was Challies not familiar with your definition of what a church is? Did you forget your own theology?
Or (and pardon my French) were you hoping that a genuine church service would be exempted from the social distancing rules? Kind of like some of the other exemptions that churches benefit from?
I for one am glad that our secular governments have more common sense when it comes to a pandemic than the collective wisdom of so called churches elders.
PS. I clearly don't speak French
Paul,
ReplyDeleteI watched some parts of the chapel service (April 12th).
Now you have a great singing voice but sometimes the occasion calls for a temperance of your gift. Specifically when singing together with your daughter, Sophie.
I mean the volume level of your booming voice by far exceeded that of hers. So much so that for most of the singing she looks like she is lip-syncing.
It is tempting to apply one's gift with the utmost passion and unencumbered by the presence of others. Instead of overshadowing another why not let their voice be heard too...
Just found out that the only disciple named in the story of Jesus raising Lazarus from the dead is none other than Thomas the Doubter (John 11:1-44).
ReplyDeleteSo let me get this straight, Thomas witnesses Lazarus being raised from the dead BUT then needs to stick his fingers in Jesus' holes in order to believe?
And on top of that Jesus says to doubting Thomas "Blessed are those who have not seen but believe".
Thomas has SEEN!
Was Jesus forgetful after his resurrection?